4.7 Article

A comparative study of anodic oxidation and electrocoagulation for treating cattle slaughterhouse wastewater

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2022.108306

Keywords

Slaughterhouse wastewater treatment; Mixed metal oxide anodes; Electrocoagulation; Anodic oxidation; Nitrogen removal; Phosphorous removal

Funding

  1. Agencia Nacional de Investigacion y Desarrollo (ANID-FONDECYT, Chile) [3200274]
  2. Solar Energy Research Center [ANID/FONDAP/15110019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the treatment of industrial cattle slaughterhouse wastewater using anodic oxidation and electrocoagulation processes, and the results showed that electrochemical techniques were effective in removing organic matter, achieving complete discoloration and disinfection.
In this study, industrial cattle slaughterhouse wastewater (ICSHWW) was treated by anodic oxidation (AO) and electrocoagulation (EC) processes using different electrode materials. Total organic carbon (TOC), chemical oxygen demand (COD), and total phosphorus (TP), among other parameters, were analyzed during the treat-ments. Electrochemical techniques were carried out in batch operation mode during five hours applying different current densities in sulfate and chloride media. The industrial cattle slaughterhouse wastewater contained TOC 1150 mg L-1, COD 4320 mg L-1, TP 25 mg L-1, TN 76 mg L-1, turbidity 516 NTU, color -absorbance 0.36 A.U. at 416 nm-, conductivity 2.79 mS cm-1, and pH 7.18. The highest TOC removal efficiencies were found at j = 20 mA cm-2 using the EC process (> 88%), with an energy consumption around 0.01 kW h m-3. Moreover, a complete discoloration and disinfection were achieved. Considering the high consumption of the freshwater destined to the livestock sector and global scarcity of water, electrochemical processes are an effective tool for decontaminating industrial waters produced from the meat industry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available