4.7 Article

An Improved Geomagnetic Navigation Method Based on Two-Component Gradient Weighting

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2022.3213779

Keywords

Navigation; Magnetic field measurement; Magnetometers; Correlation; Mathematical models; Geomagnetism; Aircraft navigation; Correlation restriction with gradient weight; geomagnetic matching navigation; geomagnetic two components calculation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61671460, 51507178, 11604384, U1430105]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This letter proposes an improved geomagnetic navigation method based on two-component gradient weighting (TCGW), which calculates the geomagnetic components using roll angle and pitch angle, and uses gradient weights to improve accuracy and universality. Simulations and experiments show that the proposed method has higher matching accuracy.
During the geomagnetic vector navigation, there are three attitude angles required for coordinate transformation in the process of geomagnetic vector elements' calculation. However, the yaw angle provided by the inertial navigation system (INS) has accumulated error which is inevitable and will seriously reduce navigation accuracy. An improved geomagnetic navigation method based on two-component gradient weighting (TCGW) is proposed in this letter. The horizontal and vertical geomagnetic components can be calculated with roll angle and pitch angle based on the implicit trigonometric theorem in the process of coordinate transformation. And the gradient weights are used as the coefficients to improve the accuracy and universality. The simulations based on four typical types have been performed, and the Monte Carlo simulation results indicated that the proposed method has higher matching accuracy than traditional vector ICCP and MAGCOM method. Furthermore, airborne navigation experiments have been carried out to verify the accuracy and effectiveness of the proposed method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available