4.7 Article

Case study for production of calcium carbonate from carbon dioxide in flue gases and steelmaking slag

Journal

JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages 37-46

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2016.02.004

Keywords

CaCO3; CO2 utilisation; Techno-economic evaluation; PCC; GCC

Funding

  1. Stora Enso Oyj
  2. Tapojarvi Oy
  3. Outotec Oyj
  4. Agency for Innovation, Tekes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, a concept for producing calcium carbonate from argon oxygen decarburisation (AOD) slag was further developed. In addition, its economic and environmental feasibility was evaluated. In the studied case, a stainless steel plant generating AOD slag and a paper plant requiring calcium carbonate are situated at a relatively close distance. The studied concept uses ammonium chloride as solvent for extracting calcium from the slag. In a subsequent step, the extracted calcium reacts with CO2 in lime kiln flue gas and precipitates as calcium carbonate. First, an industrial application of the concept was designed including the following units: a reverse osmosis unit enabling better recovery of ammonium chloride, an evaporator for removing excess water from the process, and a scrubber for removing ammonia vapours from the flue gases. The process was modelled, after which the investment costs and operational costs were estimated, and its environmental footprint was assessed. The results indicate that the process could in its current stage of development be economic for producing calcium carbonate for replacing ground calcium carbonate used by paper mills. If the net annual profit would be used as payment on the investment, the payback period would be 2.2 years. As the process consumes CO2 the process would have negative CO2 emissions, avoiding 0.3 t CO2 per tonne calcium carbonate produced. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available