4.5 Article

Medial temporal lobe and obstructive sleep apnea: Effect of sex, age, cognitive status and free-water

Journal

NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL
Volume 36, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103235

Keywords

Sleep -disordered breathing; Entorhinal cortex; Hippocampus; Sex differences; Mild cognitive impairment

Categories

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [FDN154291, MOP123294, MOP102631, PJT153259]
  2. Fonds de la Recherche du Que'bec - Sante'
  3. Quebec Bio-Imaging Network

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the association between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity and medial temporal lobe volumes is influenced by sex, age, cognitive status, and free-water fraction correction. Further research is needed to investigate whether the increase in medial temporal subregion volumes leads to neuronal death in untreated OSA patients.
Medial temporal structures, namely the hippocampus, the entorhinal cortex and the parahippocampal gyrus, are particularly vulnerable to Alzheimer's disease and hypoxemia. Here, we tested the associations between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity and medial temporal lobe volumes in 114 participants aged 55-86 years (35 % women). We also investigated the impact of sex, age, cognitive status, and free-water fraction correction on these associations. Increased OSA severity was associated with larger hippocampal and entorhinal cortex volumes in women, but not in men. Greater OSA severity also correlated with increased hippocampal volumes in participants with amnestic mild cognitive impairment, but not in cognitively unimpaired participants, regardless of sex. Using free-water corrected volumes eliminated all significant associations with OSA severity. Therefore, the increase in medial temporal subregion volumes may possibly be due to edema. Whether these structural manifestations further progress to neuronal death in non-treated OSA patients should be investigated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available