4.6 Article

Role of nonclassical temporal correlation in powering quantum random access codes

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 106, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.106.042439

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India [DST/ICPS/QuEST/2018/98]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 111-2119-M-008-002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we explore the fundamental origin of the quantum advantage behind random access code. We propose new temporal inequalities compatible with noninvasive-realist models and demonstrate that any nonzero quantum advantage of n→1 random access code in the presence of shared randomness is equivalent to the violation of the corresponding temporal inequality. Furthermore, we prove that the maximal success probability of n→1 random access code can be achieved when the maximal violation of the corresponding inequality is attained. We also show that any nonzero quantum advantage of n→1 random access code, or in other words, any nonzero violation of the corresponding temporal inequality, can certify genuine randomness.
We explore the fundamental origin of the quantum advantage behind random access code. We propose new temporal inequalities compatible with noninvasive-realist models and show that any nonzero quantum advantage of n bar right arrow 1 random access code in the presence of shared randomness is equivalent to the violation of the corresponding temporal inequality. As a consequence of this connection, we also prove that the maximal success probability of n bar right arrow 1 random access code can be obtained when the maximal violation of the corresponding inequality is achieved. We further show that any nonzero quantum advantage of n bar right arrow 1 random access code, or in other words, any nonzero violation of the corresponding temporal inequality, can certify genuine randomness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available