3.8 Proceedings Paper

Determination of Density and Viscosity of Crude Oil Samples from FTIR Data using Multivariate Regression, Variable Selection and Classification

Journal

IFAC PAPERSONLINE
Volume 55, Issue 7, Pages 845-850

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.07.550

Keywords

Chemometric tools; Partial least squares; FTIR; Crude oil; Viscosity; Density; Classification; Multivariate regression; Spectroscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the use of Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy combined with chemometric methods for quantification of crude oil properties. Crude oil samples from seven different Canadian fields were analyzed, and different methods such as PLS, PCA, iPLS, and PLS-GA were compared for model building. The results show that the best quantification results for density and viscosity were obtained using partial least squares (PLS) regression on FTIR data.
The use of Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy for quantification of crude oil properties was investigated using chemometric methods. Sample sets consisting of crude oil from seven different Canadian fields were analyzed. Different methods such as PLS, PCA, iPLS, and PLS-GA were used for model building and the results were compared. Evaluation of the models was conducted by determination of the coefficient of determination (R-2) and cross validation error. The best results for quantification of density and viscosity were obtained by partial least squares (PLS) regression on FTIR data. Data analysis on the total sample set of 82 samples yielded a prediction error (root mean square error of cross validation) of 4.5 x 10(-5) and 0.33 respectively for density and viscosity. Improvement in prediction accuracy of viscosity was obtained by using Decision tree classification on samples before applying PLS regression. Copyright (C) 2022 The Authors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available