3.8 Proceedings Paper

Fine-grained Main Ideas Extraction and Clustering of Online Course Reviews

Journal

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION, PT I
Volume 13355, Issue -, Pages 294-306

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_24

Keywords

MOOC; Key ideas extraction; Language models; Automated pipeline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Online course reviews play a key role in understanding students' perceptions about course quality, especially in the context of MOOCs. The proposed key idea extractor based on semantic units aims to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of analyzing large volumes of comments to extract key ideas and concerns expressed by students. This method provides high and stable coverage of students' ideas without relying on the verbatimness of their wording.
Online course reviews have been an essential way in which course providers could get insights into students' perceptions about the course quality, especially in the context of massive open online courses (MOOCs), where it is hard for both parties to get further interaction. Analyzing online course reviews is thus an inevitable part for course providers towards the improvement of course quality and the structuring of future courses. However, reading through the often-time thousands of comments and extracting key ideas is not efficient and will potentially incur non-coverage of some important ideas. In this work, we propose a key idea extractor that is based on fine-grained aspect-level semantic units from comments, powered by different variations of state-of-the-art pre-trained language models (PLMs). Our approach differs from both previous topic modeling and keyword extraction methods, which lies in: First, we aim to not only eliminate the heavy reliance on human intervention and statistical characteristics that traditional topic models like LDA are based on, but also to overcome the coarse granularity of state-of-the-art topic models like top2vec. Second, different from previous keyword extraction methods, we do not extract keywords to summarize each comment, which we argue is not necessarily helpful for human readers to grasp key ideas at the course level. Instead, we cluster the ideas and concerns that have been most expressed throughout the whole course, without relying on the verbatimness of students' wording. We show that this method provides high and stable coverage of students' ideas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available