4.7 Article

Quantum stability of a new Proca theory

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 105, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.024033

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [801781]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [179740]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article discusses the construction and nature of general derivative self-interactions for a massive Proca field. It is found that despite differences in scattering amplitudes, the high energy behavior of Proca-Nuevo and generalized Proca is the same when quantum corrections are taken into account.
The construction of general derivative self-interactions for a massive Proca field relies on the well-known condition for constrained systems of having a degenerate Hessian. The nature of the existing constraints algebra will distinguish among different classes of interactions. Proca-Nuevo interactions enjoy a nontrivial constraint by mixing terms of various order whereas generalized Proca interactions satisfy the degeneracy condition order by order for each individual Lagrangian. In both cases the vector field propagates at most 3 degrees of freedom. It has been shown that the scattering amplitudes of Proca-Nuevo arising at the tree level always differ from those of the generalized Proca, implying their genuinely different nature and a lack of relation by local field redefinitions. In this work, we show the quantum stability of the Proca-Nuevo theory below a specific UV cutoff. Although Proca-Nuevo and generalized Proca are different inherently in their classical structure, both have the same high energy behavior when quantum corrections arc taken into account. The arising counterterms have the exact same structure and scaling. This might indicate that whatever UV completion they may come from, we expect it to be of similar nature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available