4.6 Article

Tailoring the structure and electrochemical performance of sodium titanate anodes by post-synthesis heating

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 10, Issue 47, Pages 25178-25187

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ta07403f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Vehicle Technologies of the U.S. Department of Energy [E-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-76SF00515]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The structural changes of sodium titanate anodes under different heating conditions were studied, and it was found that heat treatment at moderate temperatures can improve capacity retention and electrochemical properties.
Sodium titanate anodes synthesized via chimie-douce methods generally require a post-synthesis dehydration step. Their crystal structures are sensitive to the heating conditions such as temperature, resulting in distinct sodium storage performance. Herein, using in situ and ex situ high-temperature X-ray diffraction, we studied in detail the structural changes of Na0.74Ti1.8150.185O4 center dot 1.27H(2)O (NTO) under various heating conditions. Electrochemical characterization revealed that NTOs heated at lower temperatures with layered structures deliver larger capacities than those heated at high temperatures with tunnel structures. Heat treatment at moderate temperatures greatly improves the capacity retention of NTO, especially stabilizing the high voltage processes that are major contributors to the capacity fading, because of the modified crystal structure and surface chemistry. Our findings suggest that post-synthesis heating is a simple and effective strategy to tailor the crystal structure, surface chemistry, and electrochemical properties of sodium titanate anodes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available