4.8 Article

Correlations between experiments and simulations for formic acid oxidation

Journal

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
Volume 13, Issue 45, Pages 13409-13417

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2sc05160e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF 149]
  2. Villum Foundation through the Villum Center for the Science of Sustainable Fuels and Chemicals [9455]
  3. Independent Research Fund Denmark [9041-00224B]
  4. Villum Foundation [19142]
  5. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  6. Carlsberg foundation [CF21-0144]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the formic acid oxidation reaction and its catalytic limitations through simulations and experiments, providing new insights into the mechanism of this reaction.
Electrocatalytic conversion of formic acid oxidation to CO2 and the related CO2 reduction to formic acid represent a potential closed carbon-loop based on renewable energy. However, formic acid fuel cells are inhibited by the formation of site-blocking species during the formic acid oxidation reaction. Recent studies have elucidated how the binding of carbon and hydrogen on catalyst surfaces promote CO2 reduction towards CO and formic acid. This has also given fundamental insights into the reverse reaction, i.e. the oxidation of formic acid. In this work, simulations on multiple materials have been combined with formic acid oxidation experiments on electrocatalysts to shed light on the reaction and the accompanying catalytic limitations. We correlate data on different catalysts to show that (i) formate, which is the proposed formic acid oxidation intermediate, has similar binding energetics on Pt, Pd and Ag, while Ag does not work as a catalyst, and (ii) *H adsorbed on the surface results in *CO formation and poisoning through a chemical disproportionation step. Using these results, the fundamental limitations can be revealed and progress our understanding of the mechanism of the formic acid oxidation reaction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available