3.8 Review

The effect of zinc supplementation on circulating levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF): A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Journal

Publisher

WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_478_20

Keywords

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor; meta-analysis; randomized controlled trial; systematic review; zinc

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review and meta-analysis found that zinc supplementation significantly increases the circulating levels of BDNF and zinc. These findings suggest a positive effect of zinc on the modulation of BDNF and zinc levels.
Background: There are randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the zinc supplementation effect on circulating levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). However, the findings of these studies are inconsistent. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the zinc supplementation effect on BDNF and zinc levels in published RCTs. Methods: We searched PubMed/Medline, Cochrane, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, EMBASE, Clinicaltrials.gov , Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials , IRCT and also key journals up to 2019. RCTs with two intervention (zinc) and control (placebo) groups that evaluated zinc supplementation efficacy on BDNF levels were included. Study heterogeneity was assessed, and then, meta-analysis was performed using the fixed-effects model. Results: Four studies were included in the present secondary analysis. Compared with placebo, zinc supplementation significantly enhanced circulating levels of BDNF [(SMD): 0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI): (0.22, 0.61)] and zinc [(SMD): 0.88, 95% CI: (0.54, 1.22)] with no considerable heterogeneity among the studies [(Q = 3.46; P = 0.32; I2% = 13.4); (Q = 2.01; P = 0, 37; I2% = 0.5), respectively]. Conclusions: Our results propose that zinc supplementation can increase the circulating levels of BDNF and zinc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available