4.6 Review

Application of bioactive metal ions in the treatment of bone defects

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
Volume 10, Issue 45, Pages 9369-9388

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2tb01684b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Jilin province department of finance
  3. Wu Jieping Medical Foundation
  4. [81772456]
  5. [2019SCZT014]
  6. [3D4212427429]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of metal ions in the treatment of bone defects has significant effects on promoting bone tissue growth, inhibiting osteoclast activity, and exerting antibacterial effects. Metal ions-modified composite scaffolds are effective in promoting bone defect healing.
The treatment of bone defects is an important problem in clinical practice. The rapid development of bone tissue engineering (BTE) may provide a new method for bone defect treatment. Metal ions have been widely studied in BTE and demonstrated a significant effect in promoting bone tissue growth. Different metal ions can be used to treat bone defects according to specific conditions, including promoting osteogenic activity, inhibiting osteoclast activity, promoting vascular growth, and exerting certain antibacterial effects. Multiple studies have confirmed that metal ions-modified composite scaffolds can effectively promote bone defect healing. By studying current extensive research on metal ions in the treatment of bone defects, this paper reviews the mechanism of metal ions in promoting bone tissue growth, analyzes the loading mode of metal ions, and lists some specific applications of metal ions in different types of bone defects. Finally, this paper summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of metal ions and analyzes the future research trend of metal ions in BTE. This article can provide some new strategies and methods for future research and applications of metal ions in the treatment of bone defects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available