4.6 Article

A new magnetic ionic liquid based salting-out assisted dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for the determination of parabens in environmental water samples

Journal

ANALYTICAL METHODS
Volume 14, Issue 46, Pages 4775-4783

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ay01403c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. [22172010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a new magnetic ionic liquid (MIL) was designed and prepared for the enrichment and detection of four parabens in environmental water samples. The method exhibited low limits of quantification, good linearity, high recoveries, as well as good repeatability and accuracy.
In this study, a new magnetic ionic liquid (MIL) was designed and prepared, containing a magnetic cation from the ligand N,N-dimethyl biguanide (DMBG) complexing with magnetic center Co2+ and a bis-trifluoromethanesulfonimide (NTf2-) anion. Using the MIL as the extraction solvent, a salting-out assisted dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (SA-DLLME) combined with high performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV) was established for the enrichment and detection of four parabens in environmental water samples. The one-factor-at-a-time experiment was employed to optimize the conditions affecting the extraction efficiency. Under the optimized extraction conditions, the limits of quantification (LOQs) of the four target analytes ranged from 2.0 ng mL(-1) to 2.8 ng mL(-1), and the coefficients of determination (R-2) were above 0.9996 in the linear range of 2.8-400 ng mL(-1). On the other hand, the method displayed good repeatability and accuracy with intra-day and inter-day relative standard deviations (RSDs) of 2.1-13.0% and recoveries of 82.0-114.6%. The established method was applied to real samples with recoveries within 81.6-125.4%, and the results demonstrated that the method was practical.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available