Dual Input Fuzzy Logic Controllers for Closed Loop Hemorrhagic Shock Resuscitation

Hemorrhage remains a leading cause of preventable death in emergency situations, including combat casualty care. This is partially due to the high cognitive burden that constantly adjusting fluid resuscitation rates can require, especially in austere or mass casualty situations. Closed-loop control systems have the potential to simplify hemorrhagic shock resuscitation if properly tuned for the application. We have previously compared 4 different controller types using a hardware-in-loop test platform that simulates hemorrhagic shock conditions, and we found that a dual input-(1) error from target and (2) rate of error change-fuzzy logic (DFL) controller performed best. Here, we highlight a range of DFL designs to showcase the tunability the controller can have for different hemorrhage scenarios. Five different controller setups were configured with different membership function logic to create more and less aggressive controller designs. Overall, the results for the different controller designs ranged from reaching the setup rapidly but often overshooting the target to more conservatively approaching the target, resulting in not reaching the target during high active hemorrhage rates. In conclusion, DFL controllers are well-suited for hemorrhagic shock resuscitation and can be tuned to meet the response rates set by clinical practice guidelines for this application.

Automated summary

Hemorrhage remains a leading cause of preventable death in emergency situations. Closed-loop control systems can simplify hemorrhagic shock resuscitation if properly tuned. In this study, we showcased the tunability of different fuzzy logic controller designs for different hemorrhage scenarios.