4.6 Article

Optimized geometries for cooperative photon storage in an impurity coupled to a two-dimensional atomic array

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 106, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.106.053706

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. postdoctoral fellowship of the Max Planck Harvard Research Center for Quantum Optics
  2. Fundacio Bancaria la Caixa [LCF/BQ/AA18/11680093]
  3. NSF
  4. AFOSR
  5. DOE

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The lattice geometry plays a crucial role in determining the effective decay rate for impurities, with the minimum effective decay rate appearing in lattices where the impurity's nearest neighbors are maximum and the number of distinct distances among nearest neighbors are minimal. In terms of impurity placement, interstitial placement consistently exhibits lower decay rates and longer photon storage compared to substitutional placement.
The collective modes of two-dimensional ordered atomic arrays can modify the radiative environment of embedded atomic impurities. We analyze the role of the lattice geometry on the impurity's emission linewidth by comparing the effective impurity decay rate obtained for all noncentered Bravais lattices and an additional honeycomb lattice. We demonstrate that the lattice geometry plays a crucial role in determining the effective decay rate for the impurity. In particular, we find that the minimal effective decay rate appears in lattices where the number of the impurity's nearest neighbors is maximal and the number of distinct distances among nearest neighbors is minimal. We further show that, in the choice between interstitial and substitutional placement of the impurity, the former always wins by exhibiting a lower decay rate and longer photon storage. For interstitial placements, we determine the optimal impurity position in the lattice plane, which is not necessarily found in the center of the lattice plaquette.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available