4.7 Article

Long-term declines in atmospheric nitrogen and sulfur deposition reduce critical loads exceedances at multiple Canadian rural sites, 2000-2018

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 22, Issue 22, Pages 14631-14656

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-22-14631-2022

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Environment and Climate Change Canada's (ECCC) Air Pollution program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Daily air and precipitation monitoring in Canada since 1983 has provided information on nitrogen and sulfur species concentrations. The data analysis reveals decreasing trends in total deposition of nitrogen and sulfur, with changes in the contribution of different forms of nitrogen deposition. Reductions in anthropogenic emissions have been effective in reducing oxidized nitrogen and sulfur deposition. However, some areas still exceed critical loads, highlighting the need for further research and assessment.
Daily air concentrations of inorganic nitrogen (N) species, including gaseous HNO3 and particulate-bound (p)NH4+ and pNO(3)(-), and sulfur (S) species, including SO2 and pSO(4)(2-), and precipitation concentrations of NO3-, NH4+, and SO42-, have been routinely monitored by the Canadian Air and Precipitation Monitoring Network (CAPMoN) since 1983. Data at 15 rural sites from 2000-2018 were used to estimate dry and wet N and S deposition fluxes, which were then used to explore their spatiotemporal trends and assess ecosystem damage through a retrospective analysis of critical loads (CLs) exceedances. Total (dry + wet) N deposition ranged from 1.7-9.5 kg N ha(-1)yr(-1) among the 15 sites, though dry deposition of NH3 and some oxidized N species were not included due to lack of monitoring data. Based on additional N measurements in 2010 at one of the sites, annual total N deposition may be underestimated by up to 32 %. Total N deposition was dominated by wet NO3- and wet NH4+ deposition, which together comprised 71 %-95 %. Contributions to dry N deposition were 40 %-74 % by HNO3, 11 %-40 % by pNH(4)(+), and 5 %-25 % by pNO(3)(-). Total S deposition ranged from 1.3-8.5 kgSha(-1)yr(-1) and was dominated by wet deposition of SO42- and dry deposition of SO2. Relative percentages of wet and dry S deposition were 45 %-89 % and 11 %-55 %, respectively. Acidic ion fluxes were greatest in southeastern Canada and were comparable among the west coast, prairie, remote, and eastern Canadian sites. Oxidized N (dry HNO3, dry pNO(3)(-), wet NO3-) deposition was greater than that of reduced N (dry pNH(4)(+), wet NH4+) in the early 2000s. In 2014-2018, reduced N deposition surpassed that of oxidized N in southeastern Canada. Total N and S deposition decreased significantly at a rate of -0.03 to -0.25 kgNha(-1)yr(-1) (-1.1 % yr(-1) to -3.3 %yr(-1)) and -0.08 to -0.66 kgSha(-1)yr(-1) (-3.5 % yr(-1) to -6.6 %yr(-1)), respectively, among the sites. The weak declining trend in total N deposition at the west coast site was consistent with the slower decline in NOx emissions in western Canada. Reductions in total N deposition were driven by its oxidized form as trends in reduced N were non-significant. As a result, reduced N contributions to total N deposition increased on average from 42 % in 2000-2004 to 53 % in 2014-2018. Anthropogenic NOx and SO2 emissions reductions in both eastern Canada and eastern US were highly effective in reducing total oxidized N and total S deposition, respectively, in eastern Canada. Acidic deposition exceeded terrestrial CL at 5 of the 14 sites and aquatic CL at 2 of the 5 sites in the early 2000s. However, exceedances have been trending downwards and acidic deposition fluxes were mostly near or below CL after 2012 for the subset of sites assessed, which support recovery from historical acidification. Further assessments of CL exceedances are required in other Canadian regions susceptible to acidification and affected by elevated or increasing N and S emissions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available