4.6 Article

Extracting accurate information from triplet-triplet annihilation upconversion data with a mass-conserving kinetic model

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 24, Issue 46, Pages 28174-28190

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2cp03986a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1800491, DMR-1752782]
  2. University of Maryland's Graduate School
  3. University of Maryland's Department of Materials Science and Engineering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Triplet-triplet annihilation upconversion (TTA-UC) is a promising process for energy-harvesting and light-generation technologies. We present a mass-conserving kinetic model for TTA-UC, which considers saturation in the data and proposes alternative figures of merit for overall performance.
Triplet-triplet annihilation upconversion (TTA-UC) is a process that shows promise for applications such as energy-harvesting and light-generation technologies. The irradiance dependent performance of TTA-UC systems is typically gauged using a graphical analysis, rather than a detailed model. Additionally, kinetic models for TTA-UC rarely incorporate mass conservation, which is a phenomenon that can have important consequences under experimentally relevant conditions. We present an analytical, mass-conserving kinetic model for TTA-UC, and demonstrate that the mass-conservation constraint cannot generally be ignored. This model accounts for saturation in TTA-UC data. Saturation complicates the interpretation of the threshold irradiance I-th, a popular performance metric. We propose two alternative figures of merit for overall performance. Finally, we show that our model can robustly fit experimental data from a wide variety of sensitized TTA-UC systems, enabling the direct and accurate determination of I-th and of our proposed performance metrics. We employ this fitting procedure to benchmark and compare these metrics, using data from the literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available