3.8 Proceedings Paper

A Certificateless Efficient and Secure Group Handover Authentication Protocol in 5G Enabled Vehicular Networks

Journal

Publisher

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/ICC45855.2022.9838953

Keywords

handover authentication; vehicle platoon; 5G V2X; certificateless aggregate signature

Funding

  1. A*STAR under its RIE2020 Advanced Manufacturing and Engineering (AME) Industry Alignment Fund -Pre Positioning (IAF-PP) [A19D6a0053]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the emergence of 5G technology, vehicular communication has made significant progress. However, the current 5G mechanism faces challenges in terms of signaling overhead and security issues. In this paper, an efficient authentication protocol is proposed and evaluated to demonstrate its resilience against malicious attacks and its security functionality.
In recent years, the world of vehicular communication is in full progress. With the emerge of the fifth-generation (5G) technology, the high bandwidth and low latency features in the 5G vehicle to everything (5G-V2X) network become possible. However, the current 5G mechanism specified by the Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Release 16 incurs high signaling overhead over the radio access network and the core network when a vehicle platoon moves from a source base station to the target base station. Moreover, it also has several security problems in terms of the failure of key forward secrecy (KFS) and lack of mutual authentication. In this paper, we propose an efficient authentication protocol for vehicle platoons in all handover scenarios. The proposed protocol has been formally evaluated by the Scyther tool to show its ability to resist major typical malicious attacks. It has also been analysed on its security functionality. The performance evaluation demonstrates that the proposed protocol is efficient in terms of signaling and computational cost.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available