3.8 Proceedings Paper

Blueprint Separable Residual Network for Efficient Image Super-Resolution

Publisher

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/CVPRW56347.2022.00099

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61906184]
  2. Shenzhen Research Program [RCJC20200714114557087]
  3. Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology, China [21DZ1100100]
  4. Joint Lab of CAS-HK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Significant progress has been made in single image super-resolution (SISR) recently, but the computational cost is too high for edge devices. To address this issue, the Blueprint Separable Residual Network (BSRN) is proposed, which introduces blueprint separable convolution and more effective attention modules to enhance the model performance. Experimental results show that BSRN achieves outstanding performance among existing efficient SR methods.
Recent advances in single image super-resolution (SISR) have achieved extraordinary performance, but the computational cost is too heavy to apply in edge devices. To alleviate this problem, many novel and effective solutions have been proposed. Convolutional neural network (CNN) with the attention mechanism has attracted increasing attention due to its efficiency and effectiveness. However, there is still redundancy in the convolution operation. In this paper, we propose Blueprint Separable Residual Network (BSRN) containing two efficient designs. One is the usage of blueprint separable convolution (BSConv), which takes place of the redundant convolution operation. The other is to enhance the model ability by introducing more effective attention modules. The experimental results show that BSRN achieves state-of-the-art performance among existing efficient SR methods. Moreover, a smaller variant of our model BSRN-S won the first place in model complexity track of NTIRE 2022 Efficient SR Challenge. The code is available at https://github.com/xiaom233/BSRN.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available