4.3 Article

Nested sampling for physical scientists

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS METHODS PRIMERS
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s43586-022-00121-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) Research Fund for International Young Scientists [11950410509]
  2. Engineer-ing and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) through an Early Career Fellowship [EP/T000163/1]
  3. Carl Zeiss Foundation - US Naval Research Laboratory's base 6.1 research program
  4. Army Research Laboratory (ARL) DoD Supercomputing Research Centers (DSRCs)
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) [ST/V001213/1, ST/V005707/1]
  6. Royal Society University Research Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This Primer examines Skilling's nested sampling algorithm and its application in Bayesian inference and multidimensional integration. The principles of nested sampling are summarized and recent developments using efficient nested sampling algorithms in high dimensions are surveyed. Detailed examples from cosmology, gravitational-wave astronomy, and materials science are provided. Finally, the Primer includes recommendations for best practices and a discussion of potential limitations and optimizations of nested sampling.
This Primer examines Skilling's nested sampling algorithm for Bayesian inference and, more broadly, multidimensional integration. The principles of nested sampling are summarized and recent developments using efficient nested sampling algorithms in high dimensions surveyed, including methods for sampling from the constrained prior. Different ways of applying nested sampling are outlined, with detailed examples from three scientific fields: cosmology, gravitational-wave astronomy and materials science. Finally, the Primer includes recommendations for best practices and a discussion of potential limitations and optimizations of nested sampling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available