4.5 Article

A low-dose therapy of fibrinogen supplement during perioperative period of total knee arthroplasty in an asymptomatic man with congenital dysfibrinogenemia: A case report

Journal

MEDICINE
Volume 101, Issue 46, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031644

Keywords

congenital dysfibrinogenemia; knee osteoarthritis; total knee arthroplasty

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This case report discusses a patient with congenital dysfibrinogenemia (CD) who was about to undergo total knee arthroplasty. Different treatment strategies were used successfully, including low dosing of fibrinogen supplements within an asymptomatic patient in a selective operation.
Rationale: Congenital dysfibrinogenemia (CD) is a rare coagulation system disease that is often treated without unified management. Individualized treatment thereof presents clinicians with great challenges. Patient concerns: A patient who was about to undergo total knee arthroplasty was found to have CD. Diagnoses: Coagulation screening revealed low fibrinogen, prolonged thrombin time, minor prolonged prothrombin time, and normal activated partial thromboplastin time were detected during admission, but no abnormal personal and family history findings were observed. Therefore, CD and hypofibrinogenemia were suspected. The gene sequencing confirmed the diagnosis of CD. Interventions: The patient received plenty and low level of fibrinogen concentrate during 2 perioperative periods, respectively. Outcomes: Successful clinical outcomes were obtained using different treatment strategies. Lessons: In contrast to prior case reports, this case illustrates the feasibility of low dosing of fibrinogen supplements within an asymptomatic patient in a selective operation. Changes in the level of fibrinogen and fibrin degradation product are of great importance for individualized treatment after supplementation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available