Ultra-Early Cranioplasty versus Conventional Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study at an Academic Level 1 Trauma Center

The goal of this study was to ascertain the efficacy, safety, and comparability of ultra-early cranioplasty (CP; defined here as <30 days from the original craniectomy) to conventional cranioplasty (defined here as >30 days from the original craniectomy). A retrospective review of CPs performed at our institution between January 2016 and July 2020 was performed. Craniectomies initially performed at other institutions were excluded. Seventy-seven CPs were included in our study. Ultra-early CP was defined as CP performed within 30 days of craniectomy whereas conventional CP occurred after 30 days. Post-operative wound infection rates, rate of return to the operating room (OR) with or without bone flap removal, operative length, and rate of post-CP hydrocephalus were compared between the two groups. Thirty-nine and 38 patients were included in the ultra-early and conventional CP groups, respectively. The average number of days to CP in the ultra-early group was 17.70 +/- 7.75 days compared to 95.70 +/- 65.60 days in the conventional group. The mean Glasgow Coma Scale upon arrival to the emergency room was 7.28 +/- 3.90 and 6.92 +/- 4.14 for the ultra-early and conventional groups, respectively. The operative time was shorter in the ultra-early cohort than that in the conventional cohort (ultra-early, 2.40 +/- 0.71 h; conventional, 3.00 +/- 1.63 h; p= 0.0336). The incidence of post-CP hydrocephalus was also lower in the ultra-early cohort (ultra-early, 10.3%; conventional, 31.6%; p = 0.026). No statistically significant differences were observed regarding post-operative infection, return to the OR, or bone flap removal. Our study shows that ultra-early CP can significantly reduce the rate of post-CP hydrocephalus, as well as operative time in comparison to conventional CP. However, the timing of CP post-DC should remain a patient-centered consideration.

Automated summary

The study aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and comparability of ultra-early cranioplasty (<30 days from craniectomy) with conventional cranioplasty (>30 days from craniectomy). The results showed that ultra-early cranioplasty significantly reduces the incidence of post-CP hydrocephalus and operative time compared to conventional cranioplasty. However, the timing of cranioplasty should be considered on a patient-centered basis.