4.6 Article

Development and validation of molnupiravir assessment in bulk powder and pharmaceutical formulation by the RP-HPLC-UV method

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 12, Issue 53, Pages 34512-34519

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ra05066h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia
  2. [IF_2020_NBU_242]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An accurate and sensitive RP-HPLC-UV method was developed for the estimation of Molnupiravir (MOL) in pure bulk powder and pharmaceutical formulation. The method showed good linearity, accuracy and precision. No significant interference was observed in the presence of common pharmaceutical formulation excipients.
An accurate, sensitive and selective RP-HPLC-UV method has been established for the estimation of Molnupiravir (MOL) in pure bulk powder and pharmaceutical formulation. Separation was achieved on an Inertsil C-18 column (150.0 mm x 4.6 mm, 5.0 mu m), using a mobile phase of 20 mM phosphate buffer pH 2.5 : acetonitrile (80 : 20, v/v%) in isocratic mode with a flow rate of 1.0 mL min(-1). The lambda(max) of MOL prepared in the chosen diluent (ethanol : water in equal proportions) was found to be 230.0 nm. The constructed calibration curve was found to be linear in the concentration range of 0.2-80.0 mu g mL(-1). The recovery% of MOL using the proposed method was 100.29%. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were 0.04 mu g mL(-1) and 0.12 mu g mL(-1), respectively. No significant interference was detected in the presence of the common pharmaceutical formulation excipients. The method was validated following the ICH recommendations. All the obtained results were statistically compared with those using reported methods and there were no significant differences. The method developed in this work was successfully employed for the assessment of MOL in bulk powder and pharmaceutical formulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available