4.6 Article

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Postpartum visit checklists for normal pregnancy and complicated pregnancy

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
Volume 227, Issue 4, Pages B2-B8

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER

Keywords

anemia; cardiovascular disease; depression; fetal growth restriction; fourth trimester; metabolic syndrome; obesity; preeclampsia; pulmonary disease; rheumatologic disorders

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to increasing risks and disparities in postpartum care, a shift towards comprehensive and continuous care is necessary. Checklists have been developed to ensure that physical and mental well-being, follow-up appointments, and future health risks are appropriately addressed.
Rising maternal morbidity and mortality rates, widening healthcare disparities, and increasing focus on cardiometabolic risk modification in at-risk patients have together catalyzed a shift in the postpartum care paradigm. What was once a single office visit in the 6 weeks after delivery is now being reimagined as a continuum of care that transitions patients from pregnancy to lifelong health optimization. However, this shift in postpartum care also comes with increased visit complexity and additional provider burden, particularly when patients have had significant pregnancy complications or have chronic diseases. To ensure that the comprehensive needs of both healthy and medically complex people are consistently met under this revised postpartum care paradigm, a postpartum visit checklist for uncomplicated postpartum patients and another checklist for those with major medical or obstetrical morbidities are presented. These checklists are designed to ensure that essential elements of physical and mental wellbeing are routinely considered, that adequate follow-up or specialty referrals are made, and that relevant future health risks are appropriately reviewed and discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available