3.8 Proceedings Paper

Shape from Polarization for Complex Scenes in the Wild

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01230

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We propose a new data-driven approach with physics-based priors for scene-level normal estimation from a single polarization image. Unlike existing shape from polarization (SfP) methods that mainly focus on estimating normal of a single object, we emphasize on estimating normals in complex scenes. By creating a real-world scene-level SfP dataset, we tackle the problem of lack of real data in complex scenes. Our learning framework with multi-head self-attention module and viewing encoding can handle increasing polarization ambiguities caused by complex materials and non-orthographic projection.
We present a new data-driven approach with physics-based priors to scene-level normal estimation from a single polarization image. Existing shape from polarization (SfP) works mainly focus on estimating the normal of a single object rather than complex scenes in the wild. A key barrier to high-quality scene-level SfP is the lack of real-world SfP data in complex scenes. Hence, we contribute the first real-world scene-level SfP dataset with paired input polarization images and ground-truth normal maps. Then we propose a learning-based framework with a multi-head self-attention module and viewing encoding, which is designed to handle increasing polarization ambiguities caused by complex materials and non-orthographic projection in scene-level SfP. Our trained model can be generalized to far-field outdoor scenes as the relationship between polarized light and surface normals is not affected by distance. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms existing SfP models on two datasets. Our dataset and source code will be publicly available at https://github.com/ChenyangLEI/sfp-wild.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available