3.8 Proceedings Paper

Exact Feature Distribution Matching for Arbitrary Style Transfer and Domain Generalization

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.00787

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study proposes an Exact Feature Distribution Matching (EFDM) method to address the problem of feature distribution matching by accurately matching the empirical Cumulative Distribution Functions (eCDFs) of image features. The method uses a fast Exact Histogram Matching (EHM) algorithm for implementation, improving computational efficiency and achieving state-of-the-art results in various visual learning tasks.
Arbitrary style transfer (AST) and domain generalization (DG) are important yet challenging visual learning tasks, which can be cast as a feature distribution matching problem. With the assumption of Gaussian feature distribution, conventional feature distribution matching methods usually match the mean and standard deviation of features. However, the feature distributions of real-world data are usually much more complicated than Gaussian, which cannot be accurately matched by using only the first-order and second-order statistics, while it is computationally prohibitive to use high-order statistics for distribution matching. In this work, we, for the first time to our best knowledge, propose to perform Exact Feature Distribution Matching (EFDM) by exactly matching the empirical Cumulative Distribution Functions (eCDFs) of image features, which could be implemented by applying the Exact Histogram Matching (EHM) in the image feature space. Particularly, a fast EHM algorithm, named Sort-Matching, is employed to perform EFDM in a plug-and-play manner with minimal cost. The effectiveness of our proposed EFDM method is verified on a variety of AST and DG tasks, demonstrating new state-of-the-art results. Codes are available at https://github.com/YBZh/EFDM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available