3.8 Proceedings Paper

Direct Voxel Grid Optimization: Super-fast Convergence for Radiance Fields Reconstruction

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.00538

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MOST of Taiwan [110-2634-F-001-009, 110-2622-8-007-010-TE2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduces a super-fast convergence approach for reconstructing the per-scene radiance field from a set of images with high quality in a short training time. This method outperforms traditional NeRF in terms of training time and quality.
We present a super-fast convergence approach to reconstructing the per-scene radiance field from a set of images that capture the scene with known poses. This task, which is often applied to novel view synthesis, is recently revolutionized by Neural Radiance Field (NeRF) for its state-of-the-art quality and flexibility. However, NeRF and its variants require a lengthy training time ranging from hours to days for a single scene. In contrast, our approach achieves NeRF-comparable quality and converges rapidly from scratch in less than 15 minutes with a single GPU. We adopt a representation consisting of a density voxel grid for scene geometry and a feature voxel grid with a shallow network for complex view-dependent appearance. Modeling with explicit and discretized volume representations is not new, but we propose two simple yet non-trivial techniques that contribute to fast convergence speed and high-quality output. First, we introduce the post-activation interpolation on voxel density, which is capable of producing sharp surfaces in lower grid resolution. Second, direct voxel density optimization is prone to suboptimal geometry solutions, so we robustify the optimization process by imposing several priors. Finally, evaluation on five inward-facing benchmarks shows that our method matches, if not surpasses, NeRF's quality, yet it only takes about 15 minutes to train from scratch for a new scene. Code: https:// github.com/sunset1995/DirectVoxGO.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available