4.6 Article

Observation of two-photon excitation-induced fluorescence of ground-state neutral carbon atoms in vacuum generated by laser ablation of graphite

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 106, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.106.052808

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Japan Science and Technol- ogy Agency Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology
  2. Ministry of Ed- ucation, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology Quantum Leap Flagship Program
  3. [JPMJPR190B]
  4. [JPMXS0118067246]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have demonstrated a practical method for producing ground-state carbon atoms in vacuum through pulsed laser ablation of graphite. The production of ground-state carbon atoms was confirmed by observing fluorescence signals, and the velocity distribution and atomic density of the produced gas were evaluated. This method can produce 1.5 x 108 atoms per pulse at a low energy density.
We demonstrated a practical gas production method for the ground-state carbon atoms in vacuum by pulsed laser ablation of graphite. The observation of 3P -3D two-photon excitation-induced fluorescence at 165.7 nm in the absence of a visible ablation plume proved the production of ground-state carbon atoms and enabled the evaluation of the velocity distribution and atomic density of the produced gas. With a low ablation fluence of 0.18 J/cm2 at 266 nm, the number of atoms produced was 1.5 x 108 per pulse. The temperature of the gas was approximately 5600 K. Spectral measurements of the plumes at higher excitation fluences of 8, 25, and 50 J/cm2 indicated that thermal sublimation at a low excitation fluence was essential to produce ground-state carbon atom gases. This method provides a promising source of atomic gas of carbon for laser cooling and precision spectroscopy when combined with precooling, such as using buffer-gas cooling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available