4.6 Article

Rational approximations of quasiperiodicity via projected Green's functions

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 106, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.054204

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Simons Investigator award
  2. Simons Collaboration on Ultra-Quantum Matter from the Simons Foundation [651440]
  3. Winton Programme for the Physics of Sustainability
  4. Marie Sklodowska-Curie program under EC [842901]
  5. Trinity College at the University of Cambridge

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We introduce the projected Green's function technique to study quasiperiodic systems and apply it to a few well-studied cases. By constructing an approximate sequence of transfer matrix equations, we can determine the existence of extended eigenfunctions. This technique proves to be flexible and effective in solving problems related to quasiperiodic systems.
We introduce the projected Green's function technique to study quasiperiodic systems such as the Aubry-Andre-Harper (AAH) model and beyond. In particular, we use projected Green's functions to construct a rational approximate sequence of transfer matrix equations consistent with quasiperiodic topology, where convergence of these sequences corresponds to the existence of extended eigenfunctions. We motivate this framework by applying it to a few well-studied cases such as the almost-Mathieu operator (AAH model), as well as more generic no-dual models that challenge standard routines. The technique is flexible and can be used to extract both analytic and numerical results, e.g., we analytically extract a modified phase diagram for Liouville irrationals. As a numerical tool, it does not require the fixing of boundary conditions and circumvents a primary failing of numerical techniques in quasiperiodic systems-extrapolation from finite size. Instead, it uses finite-size scaling to define convergence bounds on the full irrational limit.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available