4.6 Article

Colloidal stability of reduced graphene oxide materials prepared using different reducing agents

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-NANO
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages 1062-1071

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6en00174b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2014CB932001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21237002, 21107051]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The environmental transport and fate of nanomaterials are largely dependent on their colloidal stability. To date, the stability of reduced graphene oxide (RGO) materials is not well understood. We examined the electrokinetic properties and aggregation kinetics of three RGOs synthesized by reducing graphene oxide (GO) with N2H4, NaBH4, and L-ascorbic acid. In NaCl solution, the critical coagulation concentrations of the materials correlated reasonably with their C/O ratios. However, the increased aggregation tendency of RGOs was caused mainly by their increased hydrophobicity rather than decreased surface charge negativity. For both monovalent and divalent cations, less densely hydrated cations were more effective in causing aggregation than more densely hydrated cations (e.g., K+ vs. Na+, and Ca2+ vs. Mg2+) owing to the greater efficiency of the former in neutralizing surface charges and the bridging effect in the case of Ca2+. The RGOs exhibited high stability in artificial surface water, whereas different degrees of aggregation were observed in artificial groundwater. Strikingly, in artificial groundwater the aggregation tendency of the materials correlated poorly with the degree of reduction but strongly with the types and concentrations of surface O functionalities, which determined the nature and strength of interactions between RGO and cations in solution. The findings further underline that the stability of nanomaterials is controlled by the complex interplay between nanomaterial surface properties and solution chemistry factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available