4.5 Article

Comparison of Intravascular Uptake and Technical Ease Between Anteroposterior and Oblique Views During Lumbar Medial Branch Block

Journal

PAIN PHYSICIAN
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages E969-E975

Publisher

AM SOC INTERVENTIONAL PAIN PHYSICIANS

Keywords

Anteroposterior; intravascular injection; medial branch block; oblique; procedure time; radiation dose

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the incidence of inadvertent intravascular injection and technical ease of the lumbar medial branch block (MBB) between anteroposterior (AP) and oblique (OB) views.
Background: Inadvertent intravascular injection of local anesthetics can lead to false-negative results following lumbar medial branch block (MBB) performed to diagnose facet joint origin pain. A previous study demonstrated that the type of approach method could affect the incidence of intravascular injections and technical ease of the procedure. Objectives: The primary objective of our study was to compare the incidence of inadvertent intravascular injection and technical ease of the MBB between anteroposterior (AP) and oblique (OB) views. Study Design: Prospective randomized trial. Setting: An interventional pain management practice in South Korea. Methods: The incidence of intravascular uptake of contrast medium was compared using AP and OB fluoroscopic views during lumbar MBB. Injection time, radiation dose, and patient discomfort during lumbar MBB were also compared. Risk factors associated with a longer procedure time and a higher radiation dose were analyzed. Results: The incidence of intravascular injection was 22.5% (23/102) in the AP group and 17.6% (18/102) in the OB group (P = 0.382). A significantly longer injection time and a higher dose of radiation were required to complete 3 levels of MBB in the OB group than in the AP group (45.9 seconds vs 61.9 seconds, P = 0.001; 27.4 centigray [cGy]/cm(2) vs 42.2 cGy/cm(2), I = 0.004). The OB approach and left side injection were the risk factors associated with a longer total procedure time (odds ratio [OR] = 6.64, 95% CI, 1.99-22.17, P = 0.002; OR = 0.20, 95% CI, 0.06-0.67, P = 0.009, OB and AP, respectively). Limitations: The physician performing the MBB could recognize the AP or OB fluoroscopic view during procedure. Conclusion: The overall incidence rate of intravascular injection during lumbar MBB showed nearly 20% in both approach methods groups. The OB approach and left side MBBs were associated with a longer total procedure time and a higher radiation dose.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available