4.5 Article

Di-ureasil Hybrid Electrolytes Incorporating a New Proton Ionic Liquid

Journal

CHEMELECTROCHEM
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages 783-789

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/celc.201500557

Keywords

conducting materials; di-ureasil hybrids; electrolytes; fuel cells; ionic liquids

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT)
  2. FEDER [PTDC/CTM-BPC/112774/2009, UID/Multi/00709/2013, PEst-C/QUI/UI0686/2013, PEst-OE/QUI/UI0616/2014, FCT UID/CTM/50011/2013]
  3. FCT [BII/UNI/0616/QUI/2009, SFRH/BPD/63152/2009, SFRH/BPD/78919/2011, SFRH/BD/90366/2012, IF/01174/2013]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/CTM-BPC/112774/2009, SFRH/BD/90366/2012, PEst-C/QUI/UI0686/2013, PEst-OE/QUI/UI0616/2014, UID/Multi/00709/2013, UID/CTM/50011/2013, SFRH/BPD/78919/2011] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The protic ionic liquid (PIL) N-butylimidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonate ([BIm][TfO]) was obtained for the first time and incorporated into a sol-gel-derived di-ureasil matrix with a concentration of X=5, 10, and 30%, where X is the ratio of the mass of PIL per mass of poly(oxyethylene). Four years after their synthesis, the resulting quasi-anhydrous electrolytes remained amorphous, homogeneous, flexible, and thermally stable below 200 degrees C. SEM/EDS data revealed the presence of the PIL at the surface of the xerogels with X>5%, demonstrating that this type of morphological characterization is mandatory to avoid misleading ionic conductivity values. The highest ionic conductivity was produced in the washed sample with X=30% (3.5 x 10(-5) and 2.1 x 10(-3) Scm(-1) at 25 and 170 degrees C, respectively). The present family of electrolytes yielded higher conductivities than the N-ethylimidazolium trifluoromethane-sulfonate-based analogues introduced earlier by our group and may thus be considered as promising candidates for applications in fuel cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available