4.1 Article

Canoparmelia texana (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota) consists of two independent lineages

Journal

LICHENOLOGIST
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages 245-251

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0024282922000135

Keywords

Africa; biodiversity; cryptic species; lichen; molecular systematics; parmelioid lichens; taxonomy

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [PID2019-105312GB-I00]
  2. Santander-Universidad Complutense de Madrid [PR87/19-22637, G/6400100/3000]
  3. IDP/Africa Training Fund
  4. Bill Stanley Memorial Fund at the Field Museum

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies have found cryptic species in lichen-forming fungi, especially in parmelioid lichens. This study focuses on Canoparmelia texana, a sorediate species, and finds that it actually consists of two distinct lineages.
Recent studies have demonstrated that species boundaries among the lichen-forming fungi are in need of revision with the discovery of cryptic species in numerous clades, especially in parmelioid lichens. Here we focus on addressing the species boundaries in Canoparmelia texana, a sorediate species with a pantropical distribution that extends into temperate regions. We extracted DNA sequences of the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer region (ITS), large subunit (nuLSU) and mitochondrial small subunit (mtSSU) from samples mostly collected in Kenya, and analyzed them in a phylogenetic framework. We illustrate that our samples of the species as currently circumscribed do not form a monophyletic group but fall into two distinct clades, with the apotheciate C. nairobiensis nested within. Both of the discovered lineages have a wide distributional range and are common in Kenya, and Parmelia albaniensis C. W. Dodge is resurrected to accommodate one of the clades; consequently a new combination, Canoparmelia albaniensis (C. W. Dodge) Divakar & Kirika comb. nov., is proposed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available