4.7 Article

Conditions favorable for secondary ice production in Arctic mixed-phase clouds

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 22, Issue 23, Pages 15579-15601

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-22-15579-2022

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Foerderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung [200021_175824]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [268020496]
  3. European Research Council though Horizon 2020 (FORCeS) [821205]
  4. European Research Council though Horizon 2020 (MC2) [758005]
  5. EEA [EEARO-NO-2019-0423, 31/2020]
  6. Norway Grants 2014-2021 funding scheme (IceSafari) [EEARO-NO-2019-0423, 31/2020]
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021_175824] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Arctic is highly sensitive to climate change and is warming faster than other regions. Clouds play a significant role in influencing the amplified Arctic warming. Understanding the processes of ice crystal formation, particularly secondary ice production (SIP), which creates supplementary ice crystals from primary ice crystals, is crucial. This study measured the microphysical properties of Arctic mixed-phase clouds (MPCs) to gain insights into the atmospheric conditions favorable for SIP processes. It was found that SIP occurred in about 40% of the in-cloud measurements and played a significant role in Arctic MPCs. The study highlights the importance of SIP at temperatures below -8 °C, which is currently not considered in most numerical weather models.
The Arctic is very susceptible to climate change and thus is warming much faster than the rest of the world. Clouds influence terrestrial and solar radiative fluxes and thereby impact the amplified Arctic warming. The partitioning of thermodynamic phases (i.e., ice crystals and water droplets) within mixed-phase clouds (MPCs) especially influences their radiative properties. However, the processes responsible for ice crystal formation remain only partially characterized. In particular, so-called secondary ice production (SIP) processes, which create supplementary ice crystals from primary ice crystals and the environmental conditions that they occur in, are poorly understood. The microphysical properties of Arctic MPCs were measured during the Ny-& Aring;lesund AeroSol Cloud ExperimENT (NASCENT) campaign to obtain a better understanding of the atmospheric conditions favorable for the occurrence of SIP processes. To this aim, the in situ cloud microphysical properties retrieved by a holographic cloud imager mounted on a tethered balloon system were complemented by ground-based remote sensing and ice-nucleating particle measurements. During the 6 d investigated in this study, SIP occurred during about 40 % of the in-cloud measurements, and high SIP events with number concentrations larger than 10 L-1 of small pristine ice crystals occurred in 4 % of the in-cloud measurements. This demonstrates the role of SIP for Arctic MPCs. The highest concentrations of small pristine ice crystals were produced at temperatures between -5 and -3 ?C and were related to the occurrence of supercooled large droplets freezing upon collision with ice crystals. This suggests that a large fraction of ice crystals in Arctic MPCs are produced via the droplet-shattering mechanism. From evaluating the ice crystal images, we could identify ice-ice collision as a second SIP mechanism that dominated when fragile ice crystals were observed. Moreover, SIP occurred over a large temperature range and was observed in up to 80 % of the measurements down to -24 ?C due to the occurrence of ice-ice collisions. This emphasizes the importance of SIP at temperatures below -8 ?C, which are currently not accounted for in most numerical weather models. Although ice-nucleating particles may be necessary for the initial freezing of water droplets, the ice crystal number concentration is frequently determined by secondary production mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available