3.8 Article

Assessment of SIRGAS-CON tropospheric products using ERA5 and IGS

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEODETIC SCIENCE
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 195-210

Publisher

DE GRUYTER POLAND SP Z O O
DOI: 10.1515/jogs-2022-0144

Keywords

GNSS; Latin America; troposphere; ZTD

Categories

Funding

  1. European space agencies's HYDROCOASTAL project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed the quality and stability of the available ZTD data from the Geodetic Reference System for the Americas Continuously Operating Network (SIRGAS-CON). The results showed that the majority of the stations have stable and reliable ZTD, with only a small portion of stations experiencing some instability, particularly in Argentina, Uruguay, and Colombia.
Zenith Tropospheric Delays (ZTDs) are used to correct tropospheric effects that cause a delay in the signal measured by Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) receivers and obtain accurate measurements. ZTD can be estimated from GNSS processing, which means they may suffer from occasional or systematic errors. Therefore, it is necessary to assess the quality and stability of these data over time, since ZTDs are used in several applications that require centimeter precision. Within this context, this work aims to assess the available ZTD of the whole Geodetic Reference System for the Americas Continuously Operating Network (SIRGAS-CON), consisting of 467 stations, spanning the period from January 2014 to December 2020 using the most recent Numerical Weather Model ERA5 from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts and common stations to the International GNSS Service (IGS) for an intercomparison. Results show that 10% of the stations present some instability, such as periods of highly dispersed data or discontinuities, with more occurrence in stations located in Argentina, Uruguay and Colombia. The remaining 90% proved to have stable and reliable ZTD, both in comparison with ERA5 and IGS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available