4.1 Article

Is the association between socioeconomic status and nonreplaced extracted teeth mediated by dental care behaviours in adults?

Journal

COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages 532-539

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cdoe.12178

Keywords

adults; health behaviour; socioeconomic factors; tooth extraction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveTo investigate whether the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and number of nonreplaced extracted teeth (NRET) is mediated by dental care behaviours (DCBs) in adults. MethodsA random sample of adults, who participated in the 2010 dental telephone survey (n=1100) in Tehran, Iran, was investigated. The outcome was self-reported NRET due to dental caries or periodontal diseases. The main exposures were wealth index and education; and the potential mediators were the frequency of tooth brushing and flossing, and dental visiting in the previous year of the study. Multivariable regression analysis was applied to test mediation using the count ratios (CR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). ResultsThe response rate was 73%. The mean age was 38.99 (SD=13.83), and 50.8% were female. The mean NRET were 1.28 (95% CI 1.14; 1.41). NRET were greater among participants who had less than 12years of schooling [CR=4.26 (95% CI 3.52; 5.52)] and those in the poorest quintile [CR=1.89 (95% CI 1.36; 2.61)] compared with those in the most educated and wealthiest groups, respectively. People who brushed their teeth less than twice a day [CR=1.38 (95% CI 1.17; 1.62)] and did not use dental floss daily [CR=1.47 (95% CI 1.24; 1.75)] were more likely to present NRET. After controlling for DCBs, a slight decrease in the CRs was observed for both the poorest (13.3%) and the less than 12years of schooling (7.6%) groups compared to the reference groups. ConclusionsAlthough DCBs were associated with both SES and NRET, they could only be partially accountable for the observed socioeconomic inequalities in NRET.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available