4.3 Article

Relationship between the grades of a learned aversive-feeding response and the dopamine contents in Lymnaea

Journal

BIOLOGY OPEN
Volume 5, Issue 12, Pages 1869-1873

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/bio.021634

Keywords

Conditioned taste aversion; Dopamine; Food deprivation; Long-term memory; Lymnaea

Categories

Funding

  1. Network Joint Research Center for Materials and Devices [2015001]
  2. KAKENHI grants from the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science [24657055, 25291074]
  3. Waseda University [2016B-068, 2016B-069, 2016S-037]
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [227993-2013]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24657055] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The pond snail Lymnaea learns conditioned taste aversion (CTA) and remembers not to respond to food substances that initially cause a feeding response. The possible relationship between how well snails learn to follow taste-aversion training and brain dopamine contents is not known. We examined this relationship and found the following: first, snails in the act of eating just before the commencement of CTA training were poor learners and had the highest dopamine contents in the brain; second, snails which had an ad libitum access to food, but were not eating just before training, were average learners and had lower dopamine contents; third, snails food-deprived for one day before training were the best learners and had significantly lower contents of dopamine compared to the previous two cohorts. There was a negative correlation between the CTA grades and the brain dopamine contents in these three cohorts. Fourth, snails food-deprived for five days before training were poor learners and had higher dopamine contents. Thus, severe hunger increased the dopamine content in the brain. Because dopamine functions as a reward transmitter, CTA in the severely deprived snails (i.e. the fourth cohort) was thought to be mitigated by a high dopamine content.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available