4.0 Review

SENHANCE ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

Journal

ACTA CLINICA CROATICA
Volume 61, Issue -, Pages 45-50

Publisher

SESTRE MILOSRDNICE UNIV HOSPITAL
DOI: 10.20471/acc.2022.61.s3.6

Keywords

Senhance; Robotic prostatectomy: Prostate cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Robotic radical prostatectomy has become a standard of care in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Senhance, a newly approved robotic platform, was found to be feasible and safe for the procedure based on two prospective case series studies involving 234 patients. Both studies reported similar operative time and blood loss compared to laparoscopy.
Since its introduction 20 years ago, robotic radical prostatectomy has become a standard of care in the treatment of localized prostate cancer in many Centers. Until recently, they have all been performed by the only available robotic platform. Senhance is a novel robotic platform that was approved for clinical use. The term Senhance was used to systematically search PubMed and Scopus databases for relevant articles that were afterward filtered for appropriate designs and data reports. There were two reports that met all of the criteria and were included in the review. Both studies were designed as prospective case series with a total of 234 patients where the data including operative data and oncological outcomes were reported. The average operative time ranged between 180 and 195 min, with estimated blood loss between 250 and 300 mL. There was 3 Clavien - Dindo grade III, and 1 Clavien - DIndo grade IV complication reported. One of the studies compared it with laparoscopy, but no significant difference in operative time and blood loss was found. Both studies concluded that the Senhance is a feasible and safe robotic platform for radical prostatectomy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available