3.8 Article

The Effects of Behavioral Restrictions on the Spread of COVID-19

Journal

REPORTS
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/reports5040037

Keywords

COVID-19; epidemic model; broken-link model; lockdown measures; Omicron variant

Funding

  1. Nippon Foundation-Osaka University Project for Infectious Disease Prevention

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Behavioral restrictions have been implemented globally to control the spread of COVID-19. This study compares the situation in Shanghai, where a lockdown was implemented, with Taiwan, where the spread has been well controlled. The results show that while the restrictions were effective in reducing infections, the daily reported cases followed a specific pattern.
Several measures, including behavioral restrictions for individuals, have been taken throughout the world to control the spread of COVID-19. The aim of these measures is to prevent infected persons from coming into contact with susceptible persons. Since the behavioral restrictions for all citizens, such as city-wide lockdowns, were directly linked to the stagnation of economic activities, the assessment of such measures is crucial. In order to evaluate the effects of behavioral restrictions, we employed the broken-link model to compare the situation of COVID-19 in Shanghai, where a lockdown was implemented from March to June 2022, with the situation in Taiwan, where the spread of COVID-19 has been well controlled so far. The results show that the small link-connection probability was achieved by the substantial isolation of infected persons, including the lockdown measures. Although the strict measures for behavioral restrictions were effective to reduce the total number infected people, the daily reported cases per one million people followed the curve evaluated by the broken-link model. This result considers that infections are unavoidable for the population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available