4.2 Article

Vulnerabilities to Food Insecurity: Interconnected Risks and Assets for Coping Among Low-Income Men

Journal

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/713477

Keywords

food security; men; social determinants of health; poverty; SNAP

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper explores the risks and assets for food insecurity among low-income men. The findings indicate that low-income men face multiple hardships, including health problems, limited employment, lack of transportation, and housing problems. However, they also have coping assets such as financial management skills, relationships, and community assistance.
Objective: A consideration of low-income men's social, economic, and environmental contexts reveals potential vulnerabilities to food insecurity, yet their experiences of food insecurity have not been well documented. As such, this paper explores the risks and assets for food insecurity as described by a sample of 30 low-income men. Method: Data were collected through in-depth semistructured interviews that took place in 11 Department of Social Services offices in five geographically diverse Maryland counties. We used thematic analysis to analyze the data. Findings: Participants reported experiencing multiple, co-occurring, and accumulating hardships that interfered with meeting basic needs and accessing food. Risks included health problems, limited employment, lack of transportation, and housing problems. Assets for coping included financial management skills, relationships, and public and private community assistance, particularly SNAP. Conclusions: Findings indicate that although policies and programs targeting one area of hardship may help meet immediate needs, they do not address the interconnected root causes and consequences of poverty. Policies and programs should support and leverage existing assets of low-income men to amplify programmatic benefits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available