4.6 Article

The Fourth Catalog of Active Galactic Nuclei Detected by the Fermi Large Area Telescope: Data Release 3

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
Volume 263, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare in Italy under ASI-INFN [2021-43-HH.0]
  2. DOE [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  3. ASI [ASI-INFN 2021-43-HH.0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present an incremental version of the fourth catalog of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) detected by the Fermi Large Area Telescope. This version (4LAC-DR3) is based on 12 years of E > 50 MeV gamma-ray data and updates the spectral parameters, spectral energy distributions (SEDs), yearly light curves, and associations for all sources. The new AGNs in this release include 587 blazar candidates and four radio galaxies. Two new parameters, the peak energy of the SED high-energy component and the corresponding flux, are introduced to assess the Compton dominance without relying on X-ray data.
An incremental version of the fourth catalog of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) detected by the Fermi Large Area Telescope is presented. This version (4LAC-DR3) derives from the third data release of the 4FGL catalog based on 12 yr of E > 50 MeV gamma-ray data, where the spectral parameters, spectral energy distributions (SEDs), yearly light curves, and associations have been updated for all sources. The new reported AGNs include 587 blazar candidates and four radio galaxies. We describe the properties of the new sample and outline changes affecting the previously published one. We also introduce two new parameters in this release, namely the peak energy of the SED high-energy component and the corresponding flux. These parameters allow an assessment of the Compton dominance, the ratio of the inverse-Compton to the synchrotron-peak luminosities, without relying on X-ray data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available