3.8 Article

Winning Hearts and Minds Through a Policy Promoting the Agroecological Paradigm in Universities

Publisher

UNIV FEDERAL TOCANTINS, CAMPUS TOCANTINOPOLIS
DOI: 10.20873/uft.rbec.e14754

Keywords

symbolic power; agroecology; transdisciplinary; higher education; Brazil

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) -Brazil
  2. S?o Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)
  3. [564229/2010-5]
  4. [487555/2013-9]
  5. [472894/2014-15]
  6. [472509/2014-4]
  7. [472738/2014-3]
  8. [2017/04577-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assesses and discusses the impacts of Brazil's education policy on agroecology, with a focus on the establishment of NEAs. The study finds that state support for university groups dedicated to agroecology has allowed for the creation of agroecological spaces, which challenge the dominant paradigms in educational institutions and support the formation of agroecological territories.
Brazil stands out at the global level for having implemented several policies intending to promote agroecology as a productive paradigm for small-holder farmers. However, the impacts of this process of institutionalization of agroecology still lack research and debates that evaluate the effectiveness of these policies. In this paper, we assess and discuss the impacts of a policy specifically focused on education in agroecology, the support to the establishment of Centers for the Study of Agroecology and Organic Production (NEAs) in higher education institutions throughout Brazil. NEAs bring together teachers, researchers, and students who engage in teaching, research, and extension activities in partnerships with peasant farmers, their organizations, and rural extension workers. The hypothesis that guides our analysis is that this support to establish NEAs allowed redistribution of symbolic power in the universities where they were established, supporting agroecology to gain greater legitimacy inside and outside the university field. Based on an in-depth study of four NEAs, the NEAs are evaluated from the perspective of social fields in dispute. Our findings suggest that the State support to university groups dedicated to the promotion of agroecology has allowed the construction of what we have named agroecological spaces, which symbolically dispute the dominant paradigms in educational institutions, supporting the constitution of agroecological territories.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available