4.7 Review

Effectiveness of low frequency electrical stimulation for radical hysterectomy women: systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1041295

Keywords

Cervical cancer; radical hysterectomy; low frequency electrical stimulation; urinary retention

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explored the effects of low frequency electrical stimulation (LFES) in preventing urinary retention after radical hysterectomy in women with cervical cancer. The results showed that women receiving LFES had improved therapeutic effect, reduced residual urine volume, and shorter catheter retention time. Additionally, the muscle strength scores of pelvic floor muscles were higher in the LFES group.
Introduction: To explore the effects of low frequency electrical stimulation (LFES) in preventing urinary retention (UR) after radical hysterectomy (RH) in women with cervical cancer. Methods: Seven electronic bibliographic databases were searched from inception to December 25, 2021. The mean difference (MD) or risk ratio (RR) with its corresponding 95% CI were selected as effect size. The meta analysis of all data was conducted using RevMan 5.4 and the evidence was summarized according to GRADE (the grading of recommendation, assessment, development and evaluation). Results: Twelve RCTs consisting of 1033 women with cervical cancer who had undergone radical hysterectomy were included. Compared with women in the control group, women receiving LFES had improved therapeutic effect (RR=0.22,95%CI 0.16 to 0.29), and reduced residual urine volume (MD =-32.27, 95%CI-34.10 to-30.43) and catheter retention time (MD =-4.46, 95%CI-5.17 to-3.76) following treatment. Muscle strength scores of pelvic floor type I and type II muscle fibers in the LFES group were also higher than in the control group (MD =1.07, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.24). Conclusion: LFES may be an effective auxiliary treatment for women with cervical cancer after hysterectomy, which can help reduce the duration of indwelling urethral catheter and residual urine volume.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available