4.7 Review

Effects of psychological interventions on high sports performance: A systematic review

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1068376

Keywords

sports psychology; intervention programs; athletes; high performance; psychological skills

Funding

  1. Direccion de Investigacion de la Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
  2. [C-032-2021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article aims to analyze scientific articles between 2010 and 2020 that evaluated the effect of psychological interventions on high-performance athletes. The results show that psychological interventions have a positive impact on sports performance, providing sports institutions and professionals with more knowledge and resources to implement these programs.
Introduction: Intervention programs in sports psychology aid to modify the thoughts and behaviors of athletes in order to improve their performance in sports settings. For high-performance athletes, these interventions are very relevant, given that they constantly face pressure towards obtaining sporting achievements. Methods: This systematic review aims to analyze the scientific articles between 2010 and 2020 that evaluated the effect of psychological interventions on high-performance athletes. In the search procedure, nine studies were selected, the most studied variables were psychological skills, psychological flexibility, and stress. Results: The 44% of the interventions were designed by the research authors themselves, while the remaining 56% were replicated programs, which already had scientific evidence. Discussion: Psychological interventions have a positive impact on sports performance. This review allows sports institutions and professionals to have more knowledge and resources at their disposal to implement these types of programs in their sports planning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available