4.0 Article

Inter-layer and inter-subject variability of diurnal gene expression in human skin

Journal

NAR GENOMICS AND BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nargab/lqac097

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports 24-hour gene expression rhythms in the epidermis and dermis layers of human skin, showing differences between the layers and identifying biomarkers for internal clock phase. This research is significant in advancing our understanding of human skin and quantifying sources of variability in circadian rhythms.
The skin is the largest human organ with a circadian clock that regulates its function. Although circadian rhythms in specific functions are known, rhythms in the proximal clock output, gene expression, in human skin have not been thoroughly explored. This work reports 24 h gene expression rhythms in two skin layers, epidermis and dermis, in a cohort of young, healthy adults, who maintained natural, regular sleep-wake schedules. 10% of the expressed genes showed such diurnal rhythms at the population level, of which only a third differed between the two layers. Amplitude and phases of diurnal gene expression varied more across subjects than layers, with amplitude being more variable than phases. Expression amplitudes in the epidermis were larger and more subject-variable, while they were smaller and more consistent in the dermis. Core clock gene expression was similar across layers at the population-level, but were heterogeneous in their variability across subjects. We also identified small sets of biomarkers for internal clock phase in each layer, which consisted of layer-specific non-core clock genes. This work provides a valuable resource to advance our understanding of human skin and presents a novel methodology to quantify sources of variability in human circadian rhythms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available