4.6 Article

Theory of spin-polarized high-resolution electron energy loss spectroscopy from nonmagnetic surfaces with a large spin-orbit coupling

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 106, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.235117

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through the Heisenberg Programme [ZA 902/3-1, ZA 902/6-1]
  2. DFG [ZA 902/5-1, ZA 902/7-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper extends the theory of low-energy electron scattering by including spin-orbit coupling. The impact of this interaction on the scattering cross section is discussed, particularly for a spin-polarized electron beam scattered from nonmagnetic surfaces with strong spin-orbit coupling. An expression for the scattering cross section is derived under certain assumptions, which can be used for numerical calculations of spin-polarized spectra recorded by spin-polarized high-resolution electron energy-loss spectroscopy experiments.
The scattering theory of low-energy (slow) electrons has been developed by Evans and Mills [Phys. Rev. B 5, 4126 (1972)]. The formalism is merely based on the electrostatic Coulomb interaction of the scattering electrons with the charge-density fluctuations above the surface and can describe most of the interesting features observed in the high-resolution electron energy-loss spectroscopy experiments. Here we extend this theory by including the spin-orbit coupling in the scattering process. We discuss the impact of this interaction on the scattering cross section. In particular, we discuss cases in which a spin-polarized electron beam is scattered from nonmagnetic surfaces with a strong spin-orbit coupling. We show that under some assumptions one can derive an expression for the scattering cross section, which can be used for numerical calculations of the spin-polarized spectra recorded by spin-polarized high-resolution electron energy-loss spectroscopy experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available