4.1 Review

Research Progress of Metachromatic Leukodystrophy

Journal

PROGRESS IN BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
Volume 49, Issue 11, Pages 2107-2114

Publisher

CHINESE ACAD SCIENCES, INST BIOPHYSICS
DOI: 10.16476/j.pibb.2022.0363

Keywords

metachromatic leukodystrophy; ARSA; diagnosis; therapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) is a rare hereditary leukoencephalopathy caused by ARSA gene mutation. Currently, there is no effective treatment for MLD, but recent studies have shown that intrathecal injection of rhASA can delay disease progression. Prenatal molecular diagnosis is the main method for preventing MLD.
Metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) is a rare hereditary leukoencephalopathy caused by arylsulfatase A (ARSA) gene mutation. There are individual differences in the clinical manifestations and disease progression speed of MLD, but almost all patients will eventually have complete loss of motor and cognitive functions. Clinically, patients are divided into late infantile onset, juvenile onset and adult onset according to their age of onset and severity of illness. The clinical diagnosis of MLD includes progressive neurological regression and typical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. Its clinical manifestations are similar to many diseases, and it needs to be differentiated from other leukoencephalopathies and lysosomal storage diseases. There is no effective treatment for MLD. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or bone marrow transplantation, enzyme replacement therapy and gene therapy are the research hotspots of MLD treatment. At present, only symptomatic support treatment can be carried out for patients. Recent studies have found that intrathecal injection of recombinant human arylsulfatase A (rhASA) could delay the progress of the disease. Effective prenatal molecular diagnosis for MLD families is the main method to prevent the occurrence of MLD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available