4.4 Article

Rational design of Ruddlesden-Popper perovskite electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction to hydrogen peroxide

Journal

SUSMAT
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages 456-465

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sus2.71

Keywords

electrocatalysis; hydrogen peroxide; oxygen reduction reaction (ORR); perovskite

Funding

  1. FWO [12ZV320N]
  2. NNSF [22005250]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, the electrochemical synthesis of H2O2 through a 2e(-) transfer method of oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) has attracted interest from both academics and the industry. This study successfully improved the selectivity and activity of H2O2 by using a Ruddlesden-Popper perovskite oxide as a catalyst.
Although the oxygen reduction process to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is a green option for H2O2 generation, the low activity and selectivity hindered the industry's process. In recent years, the electrochemical synthesis of H2O2 through a 2e(-) transfer method of oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) has piqued the interest of both academics and industry. Metal oxide catalysts have emerged as a novel family of electrochemical catalysts due to their unusual physical, chemical, and electrical characteristics. In this work, we first developed a Ruddlesden-Popper perovskite oxide (Pr2NiO4+delta) as a highly selective and active catalyst for 2e(-) ORR to produce H2O2. Molybdenum was introduced here to adjust the oxidation states of these transition metals with successful substitution into Ni-site to prepare Pr2Ni1-xMoxO4+delta, and the molybdenum substitution improves the H2O2 selectivity during the ORR process, in 0.1 M KOH, from 60% of Pr2NiO4+delta to 79% of Pr2Ni0.8Mo0.2O4+delta at 0.55 V versus RHE. A limiting H2O2 concentration of 0.24 mM for Pr2NiO4+delta and 0.42 mM for Pr2Ni0.8Mo0.2O4+delta was obtained at a constant current of 10 mA/cm(2) using a flow-cell reactor using a gas-diffusion electrode.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available