4.3 Article

Association of Islet Amyloid Polypeptide to C-Peptide Ratio With Cystic Fibrosis-Related Diabetes A Prospective Cross-sectional Study

Journal

PANCREAS
Volume 51, Issue 8, Pages 1029-1036

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000002134

Keywords

cystic fibrosis; diabetes; C-peptide; islet amyloid polypeptide; cross-sectional study; blood biomarkers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the ratio of islet amyloid polypeptide to C-peptide was significantly higher in patients with CFRD compared to those without CFRD. This ratio could potentially serve as a marker for predicting CFRD in adults with CF, but further validation in longitudinal cohort studies is needed.
ObjectivesEarly detection of cystic fibrosis (CF) related diabetes (CFRD) improves health outcomes and reduces CF-related mortality. The study aims to evaluate the ratio of islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP) to C-peptide in CF patients with diabetes and without diabetes.MethodsCross-sectional analysis was carried out in a prospective cohort of 33 participants (CF [n = 16] and CFRD [n = 18]). We examined the association of plasma IAPP:C-peptide ratio with clinical information, including glycated hemoglobin, and lung function markers.ResultsThe median (interquartile range) IAPP:C-peptide ratio was significantly (P = 0.004) higher in people with CFRD (4.8 [4.5]) compared with participants without CFRD (12.1 [19.7]). The ratio of IAPP to C-peptide significantly accounted for a 38% variation in the diabetes status in patients with CF (r(2) = 0.399, P < 0.001). Islet amyloid polypeptide is strongly correlated with serum ferritin levels (r = 0.683, P = 0.005) and forced expiratory volume in CFRD, but not in nondiabetic participants with CF.ConclusionsIslet amyloid polypeptide:C-peptide ratio could be a potential marker of CFRD in adults with CF. Further research requires validation of this marker in longitudinal cohort studies to confirm the capability of IAPP:C-peptide to predict CFRD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available