4.0 Article

Accuracy of dynamic implant navigation surgery performed by a novice operator A preliminary study in a cadaveric model

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERIZED DENTISTRY
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 377-385

Publisher

QUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO INC
DOI: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b2588207

Keywords

computer-assisted surgery; computer-guided surgery; dynamic navigation; accuracy; dental implant; dental navigation

Funding

  1. Incotrading (Madrid, Spain)
  2. International University of Catalonia (Barcelona, Spain)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on a study performed by a novice operator on a cadaveric model, dynamic navigation-guided surgery (DNGS) allows for accurate implant positioning, with practice required to develop the necessary eye-hand coordination.
Aim: The main objective was to evaluate the accuracy of dynamic navigation-guided surgery (DNGS) for implant positioning performed by a novice operator. The secondary objectives were to analyze the operator's learning curve and identify possible complications deriving from the technique. Materials and methods: Twenty-five implants were placed in eight partially edentulous human heads. Preoperative CBCT scans were imported to planning software to determine the implant positions. Implants were placed using a dynamic navigation system. Postoperative CBCTs were superimposed onto the implant planning images. Discrepancies between the virtually planned implant positions and the postoperative positions were evaluated by measuring horizontal platform deviation, apex deviation, apicocoronal (vertical) deviation, and angular deviation. Results: Mean platform, apex, vertical, and angle deviations were 1.55 +/- 0.81 mm, 2.45 +/- 0.84 mm, 1.59 +/- 0.70 mm, and 5.56 +/- 4.03 degrees, respectively. No significant differences were found between the maxilla and mandible or between anterior and posterior sites. A flat learning curve was observed, with the exception of the implant platform, where a tendency toward improvement in accuracy was observed between the 8th and the 17th implant placed. No complications were reported. Conclusions: Based on the results of a study performed by a novice operator on a cadaveric model, DNGS allows accurate implant placement within a 2-mm safety margin in terms of implant platform and vertical positions, and a 3-mm margin in apical vicinities. The technique requires practice to learn the required eye-hand coordination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available